Tavondo
HomeCompetitionsQuizGuidesPlatforms

No matching competitions

Try a platform, topic, or competition title

中文
HomeCompetitionsQuizGuidesPlatforms
中文RegisterSign in
Tavondo

Find AI contests that fit you—quiz, recommendations, catalog, and guides in one place.

Discover

CompetitionsQuizGuidesPlatforms

Account

Sign inRegisterSkill quiz

© 2026 Tavondo

中文
  1. Home
  2. Competitions
  3. Measuring Progress Toward AGI - Cognitive Abilities

Competition workspace

KaggleGeneral MLResearchRegistration openRegistration openSource may be stale

Measuring Progress Toward AGI - Cognitive Abilities

Researchers, benchmark designers, and advanced LLM practitioners interested in evaluating cognitive abilities beyond memorization or simple benchmark recall.

Open official pageSign in to saveOpen guide

Suggested next step

Decide whether this contest fits your current stage before you sink time into the leaderboard.

Beginner score

16/100

Higher means a safer real starting point for your current stage.

Learning value

72/100

Measures whether the competition teaches habits you can transfer elsewhere.

Estimated effort

25-80 hours

Use this to check whether the task fits your current time budget.

Metric

See official page

If you cannot explain this metric clearly yet, you probably still need a bit of prep.

Who this competition fits

Researchers, benchmark designers, and advanced LLM practitioners interested in evaluating cognitive abilities beyond memorization or simple benchmark recall.

Official blurb (unedited)
Design high-quality benchmarks that go beyond recall to evaluate how frontier models truly reason, act, and judge.

Prep before joining

If the items below still feel unfamiliar, you usually get a better result by preparing first instead of rushing in.

benchmark design basics

LLM evaluation literacy

technical writing

awareness of data leakage and contamination risks

Where the real difficulty shows up

The real friction is usually not library usage. It is validation, time allocation, and task framing.

The core work is benchmark design and evaluation methodology. It requires understanding what a high-quality AGI-oriented task measures, how to avoid leakage, and how to communicate judging criteria clearly.

Read this first

This guide is the best pre-read if you want a cleaner start instead of trial-and-error.

How to learn feature engineering, validation, and competition workflow without heavy hardware.

No GPU? Pick Competitions That Still Teach You Good Habits

Your decision

Use these fields to make a quick decision before you dive deeper.

Status
Registration open
Registration
Registration open
Eligibility
18+ · Location rules
Event timeline
Event ends · Apr 16, 2026
Reward
$200,000
Compute
No compute
Official metric
See official page
Verification
Source page verified

This competition is better treated as a comparison option inside your shortlist before you invest more time.

Save to account

Sign in to save competitions and build your own shortlist.

Sign in to saveCreate account

Official source

Rules, files, submission details, and the live deadline still come from the official page.

Open official page

Related competitions

These competitions share a similar domain or difficulty level.

Baidu AI Studio

General ML

星河产业应用创新奖-科学智能论文赛道

Registration unverified

Baidu AI Studio

General ML

第二届全球AI药物研发算法大赛

Registration unverified

Huawei Cloud

General ML

2026年度中国青年科技创新“揭榜挂帅”擂台赛·华为赛道

Registration closed · Event active

Huawei Cloud

General ML

2026 CCF量子计算编程挑战赛·第八届MindSpore Quantum黑客松-量子启发算法赛道

Registration closed

Data and review state

Separate what is confirmed from what still needs review. Official rules and deadlines win — report anything that looks wrong.

Source page verifiedMetric confirmedReviewedSource may be stale
Source published
Mar 17, 2026
Source created
Jan 26, 2026
Published on this site
Jul 1, 2026
Source freshness warning
The current platform source is marked stale by the freshness check: kaggle. Re-check the official page before treating this record as fully current.

Official metric name was not present on the list/detail payload; evaluation_method points to the Kaggle evaluation page.